Rapid Asset ManagementĪs a result of a lot more larger image files, we are now seeing pressure on the software that manages those photographic assets when files were small, there wasn't any imperative to seek high-performance processing, but this has become an obvious bottleneck. If, for example, you are a wedding photographer, shooting 2,000 images for a single event creates a significant data processing headache, all of which costs a considerable amount to set up and maintain. With cameras such as Fuji's GFX 100 creating 100 MB+ size files, you need large media cards, an ultra-fast connection to your PC, storage, and a large backup solution. Digital was heralded as an almost "no-cost" solution you already had a computer and just dumped those tiny JPEGs into a spare directory. There was a charge at every stage before you carefully indexed and filed your negatives. Back in film days, there was an upfront cost associated with creating an image: you paid for the film, the development, and the printing. This wealth of the visual is creating a data headache that affects all aspects of the photographic workflow, foremost among these is the size of the data archive. What is undeniable is that we are shooting more images than ever, using higher-resolution sensors that create larger files. The care you take will depend upon what you want to achieve and who you are delivering the images to. Digital asset management is something we all do as photographers - whether it's as simple as copying image JPEGs straight off an SD card and dumping them into a "Pictures" folder or fully integrating Lightroom into a workflow so that the raw files end up pre-tagged in date-named folders that are cloud-synced for anywhere access.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |